Which document is developed next if the Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) recommends a non-materiel solution?

Which document is developed next if the Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) recommends a non-materiel solution?

• A. Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy Change Recommendation (DCR)
• B. Product Support Strategy
• C. System Engineering Plan
• D. Program Management Plan

Answer: (A)

When a Capabilities-Based Assessment points to a non-materiel solution, the next step is to document a comprehensive set of changes across multiple domains in the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy Change Recommendation. This DCR captures what must change in how the organization operates, how people are trained and led, and what policies or doctrine need to be updated to achieve the desired capability without buying new equipment. The reason this is the best next document is that non-materiel solutions rely on adjustments to processes, structures, and governance, not on hardware or system design. The DCR provides a clear, authoritative plan for those changes and serves as the basis for decisions about whether a materiel solution is ever needed later, or if the organization can close the gap entirely through these cross-domain changes. Why the other documents aren’t the right immediate step here: a Product Support Strategy focuses on sustaining and supporting a system, which is tied to materiel solutions and lifecycle logistics. A System Engineering Plan centers on the technical design and integration of a potential system, relevant to materiel development rather than non-materiel changes. A Program Management Plan outlines how a program will be managed but doesn’t specify the cross-domain changes required to achieve the capability without materiel.

When a Capabilities-Based Assessment points to a non-materiel solution, the next step is to document a comprehensive set of changes across multiple domains in the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy Change Recommendation. This DCR captures what must change in how the organization operates, how people are trained and led, and what policies or doctrine need to be updated to achieve the desired capability without buying new equipment.

The reason this is the best next document is that non-materiel solutions rely on adjustments to processes, structures, and governance, not on hardware or system design. The DCR provides a clear, authoritative plan for those changes and serves as the basis for decisions about whether a materiel solution is ever needed later, or if the organization can close the gap entirely through these cross-domain changes.

Why the other documents aren’t the right immediate step here: a Product Support Strategy focuses on sustaining and supporting a system, which is tied to materiel solutions and lifecycle logistics. A System Engineering Plan centers on the technical design and integration of a potential system, relevant to materiel development rather than non-materiel changes. A Program Management Plan outlines how a program will be managed but doesn’t specify the cross-domain changes required to achieve the capability without materiel.